Xref: utzoo comp.mail.elm:2964 comp.sources.bugs:2512
Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!crdgw1!ge-dab!tarpit!tous!alfred!fang!ablnc!abcom!occrsh!att!westmark!hico2!kak
From: kak@hico2.UUCP (Kris A. Kugel)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm,comp.sources.bugs
Subject: bug with Configure in elm 2.3 (and possible metaconfig)
Keywords: elm VOIDSIG metaconfig
Message-ID: <246@hico2.UUCP>
Date: 18 Aug 90 17:05:12 GMT
Followup-To: comp.mail.elm,comp.sources.bugs
Organization: High Country Software
Lines: 31

for some reason, when I run the Config script,
it doesn't set the VOIDSIG flag right in config.h:


/* VOIDSIG:
 *	This symbol is defined if this system declares "void (*signal())()" in
 *	signal.h.  The old way was to declare it as "int (*signal())()".  It
 *	is up to the package author to declare things correctly based on the
 *	symbol.
 */
#	VOIDSIG 	/**/

Looks to me like somehow the undef got waylaid.

I couldn't find anything special about the d_voidsig flag in
the Configure script, and I'm not willing to spend the time
right now to investigate to it further.

I am running using ksh on a 3b1 (alias unixpc, alias 7300).

I am not currently receiving this newsgroup, so any reply should
be sent by e-mail:
                               Kris A. Kugel
                              (201) 842-2707
       {uunet,att,rutgers}!westmark!hico2!kak  <--well-connected
		    {tsdiag,ka2qhd}!hico2!kak  <--frequent
{ssbn,zorch,zinn,ditka,daver,attdso}!hico2!kak <--every two days

PS. I suspect that the "use Reply/To" option in the config scrip should
alway be NO if you don't have a smart mailer or pathalias and aren't
next to major nodes.