Xref: utzoo comp.os.os2.misc:144 comp.os.msdos.misc:175 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:1123 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:1128 comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware:84
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!mcsun!cernvax!chx400!hslrswi!aut!nbladt
From: nbladt@aut.UUCP (Norbert Bladt)
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Subject: Re: 1024x768 monitors: 14" vs. 16+"
Message-ID: <675@aut.UUCP>
Date: 24 Aug 90 06:30:55 GMT
References: <19265@ttidca.TTI.COM>
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.misc
Organization: Ascom Autelca AG, CH-3073 Guemligen Switzerland
Lines: 22

terence@ttidca.TTI.COM (Terence Davis) writes:


>This morning I read some articles about the Sony CDP 1304 1024x768
>non-interlaced 14" monitor.  I have decided to go the route of 1024x768
>and need to choose a monitor.  My video board, a NEC Graphics Engine, will
>do 1024x768 NI so I want a non-interlaced monitor.  That eliminated the
>NEC 3D (which I don't like anyway).  But then there's the NEC 4D 16" and Sony
>1304 14".  The NEC is ~$1150 mail order (~$1400 non-mail order) while the
>Sony is ~$698 from stores around me.
I would look for the EIZO 9070 S (in Europe) or Nanao 9070 (in USA)
It does 1024x768 NI, is 16" and should be cheap,t, too. It doesn't have memory
either. And IMHO it looks good. Just a hint :-)

>Send responses to terence@ttidca.tti.com or the net.

Norbert Bladt.
-- 
Please use this path as return address. DON'T USE THE RETURN PATH IN THE HEADER
Norbert Bladt, Ascom Autelca AG, Worbstr. 201, CH-3073 Guemligen, Switzerland
Phone: +41 31 52 92 14
EMail: ..!uunet!mcsun!chx400!hslrswi!bladt