Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!proto!joe From: joe@proto.COM (Joe Huffman) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer Subject: Re: DOS 5.0, glossy pages, On/OFF computers and Side or no Side. Summary: Another example of PC Magazine bias towards the ad bucks... Message-ID: <1396@proto.COM> Date: 21 Aug 90 20:32:06 GMT References: <1990Aug21.000120.28505@water.waterloo.edu> Organization: Prototronics; Sandpoint, Idaho Lines: 24 In article , mju@mudos.ann-arbor.mi.us (Marc Unangst) writes: > This is one of the reasons I'm not going to renew my subscription when > it lapses in November. (The others include much too much coverage of > Windows 3.0 and OS/2, along with their apparant readiness to give > anybody with a large ad budget a good review. Did anybody but me Did you see that when they reviewed Turbo C++ they benchmarked it with Microsoft C and Turbo C, but not Zortech C/C++? How about comparing apples with apples guys? Or were they too afraid of offending Borland? Grrrrrrrrr.... --- Zortech mailing list: send email to 'ztc-list-request@uunet' with: Add: your-use-name@your-machine-name In the body of the message. --- Zortech is my major source of income. Statements about them or their competitors cannot be totally without bias. -- joe@proto.com uunet!proto!joe FAX: 208-263-8772