Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uwm.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!prls!philabs!ppgbms!paul From: paul@ppgbms (Paul Evan Matz) Newsgroups: comp.periphs.scsi Subject: Re: Sun SCSI termination Summary: Chris is definitely right about SS1+ TERMPWR; Sorry for the misinfo! Keywords: TERMPWR Termination Message-ID: <36147@ppgbms.UUCP> Date: 24 Aug 90 15:18:38 GMT References: <1990Aug13.011541.6424@rice.edu> <36040@ppgbms.UUCP> <1990Aug22.170552.17671@com50.c2s.mn.org> Reply-To: paul@ppgbms.UUCP (Paul Evan Matz) Organization: PPG Biomedical Sys., Pleasantville, NY. Lines: 27 In article <1990Aug22.170552.17671@com50.c2s.mn.org> chris@com50.c2s.mn.org (Chris Johnson) writes: > >Uh, well now this is completely contrary to my experience with the >Sparcstation 1/1+. They both have 125V/2A FUSES on the the TERMPWR >lead, and provide nominal +5V. Either that, or my multimeter was lying. Sorry for broadcasting wrong information. Chris is right about the SS1 & 1+. Just went into the lab to checked it out, and it seems his multimeter is right on. (Open mouth, insert foot...) I feel quite silly about this. The reason I thought this about the SS was due to checking a VERY old SS1 that we borrowed from our sales office for evaluation 6 months ago. I could have botched it when checking TERMPWR, but I was convinced there was no +5V present. Anyone out there have a really old original SS1 who might have noticed this? Actually I'm quite happy about the outcome of this, since we do use an external terminator; Now, at least, we don't have to decide which device is the one which should be jumpered to source TERMPWR. Again, let me apologize for the slanderous comments. ___________________________________________________________________ |Regards, PPG Biomedical Systems | |Paul Matz One Campus Drive | |914-741-4685 Pleasantville, NY. 10570 | |{..}!uunet!philabs!ppgbms!paul ppgbms!paul@philabs.philips.com | |___________________________________________________________________|