Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!munnari.oz.au!murdu!ucsvc.ucs.unimelb.edu.au!pitvax!obh From: obh@ifi.uio.no (Ole Bj|rn Hessen) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400 Subject: Re: Re: Printable format (was: Re: ISO/CCITT meeting report) Message-ID: <1990Aug20.220037.7111@ifi.uio.no> Date: 20 Aug 90 22:00:37 GMT References: <9008201119.aa09713@ICS.UCI.EDU> Sender: obh@ifi.uio.no (Ole Bj|rn Hessen) Reply-To: obh@ifi.uio.no (Ole Bj|rn Hessen) Organization: Dept. of Informatics, University in Oslo, Norway Lines: 29 Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL0] x-attn: jns X-Previously-To: comp-protocols-iso-x400@uunet.uu.NET ReSent-To: mhsnews@ICS.UCI.EDU In article <9008201119.aa09713@ICS.UCI.EDU>, JENNINGS%IRLEARN@pucc.princeton.edu (Dennis Jennings) writes: > Would it be all too unreasonable to suggest that the business card > address and the e-mail address are one and the same thing, and that E-mail is a fundamental different media. It is much more interactive and spontaneous than snail-mail. In some ways it is comparable to communicating by telephone. > Personal Name Dennis M. Jennings > Functional Name Director, Computing Services > Organisational Unit Computing Services > Organisation/PRMD University College Dublin > > Country/ADMD Ireland Imaging yourself having to type such an address on the telephone every time you want a chat with your neighbour or your co-worker. It takes approximatively 3-5 seconds to type an 822-address. (A bit more if you have to search for it :-) (Or if the recipient belongs to certain domains in german ;-) I'm not rejecting S/A addresses, just saying that I like to do it fast (sending letters, that is). Besides, I like 822-addresses, I think they're quite mnemonic and very easy to remember. Ole Bjorn. obh@usit.uio.no