Xref: utzoo comp.protocols.nfs:1210 comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc:3619
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!samsung!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!luth!sunic!mcsun!hp4nl!dutrun!rcdswal
From: rcdswal@dutrun.UUCP (Guus van der Wal)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: PC-NFS, buffers and caches
Message-ID: <1977@dutrun.UUCP>
Date: 27 Aug 90 11:10:10 GMT
Reply-To: rcdswal@dutrun.UUCP (G.v.d.Wal.)
Organization: Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
Lines: 20

This may have been asked before, but ..

One of our clients wants to use PC-NFS next to a
rather memory demanding application.
The two don't fit in memory together even in a barebone stripped
system.

The book says "PCNFS.SYS is approximately 75 KB (after allocating
buffer and cache structures)"
We discovered tha PC-NFS allocates buffers for drives D - V, where
our client needs only drive D.

Can we tell PC-NFS not to claim that many buffers and how much
memory can we gain this way

-- 
Guus van der Wal
Computing Centre Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands
USEnet: rcdswal@dutrun.tudelft.nl
BITnet: rcdswal@hdetud1.bitnet