Xref: utzoo alt.security:1444 alt.folklore.computers:4913 comp.society.futures:2056 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!letni!merch!sneaky!gordon From: gordon@sneaky.UUCP (Gordon Burditt) Newsgroups: alt.security,alt.folklore.computers,comp.society.futures Subject: Re: Re: Feedback on Computer Crime - Apology Message-ID: <36289@sneaky.UUCP> Date: 26 Aug 90 09:21:49 GMT References: <1990Aug23.235734.9401@ddsw1.MCS.COM> <19375@ttidca.TTI.COM> Followup-To: alt.security Organization: Gordon Burditt Lines: 21 >}All I can say is that a country where a person can get 8 felony counts for >}just CALLING A PHONE NUMBER, is not a free country. > >He didn't just call a number. He called a number he knew had a modem on >the other end and connected with his modem. It was a number he had no >legitimate reason to call. His saying there was no damage doesn't mean >there wasn't any. If nothing else, he tied up that number and caused a >temporary denial of service to the legitimate users. I know a lot of people who have called a number they knew had a human on the other end, and connected with their human. It was a number they had no legitimate reason to call. Their saying there was no damage doesn't mean there wasn't any. If nothing else, they tied up that number and caused a temporary denial of service to the legitimate callers. They also wasted the time of the human on the other end. JAIL TELEMARKETERS AND WRONG-NUMBER DIALERS (for the FIRST offense)! Do we really want to fill up the jails this badly? Gordon L. Burditt sneaky.lonestar.org!gordon