Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!dsac.dla.mil!dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil!nfs1675
From: nfs1675@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil ( Michael S Figg)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Lattice/SAS C  5.10 HERE!
Summary: LSE usage
Message-ID: <2419@dsacg3.dsac.dla.mil>
Date: 23 Aug 90 13:41:35 GMT
References: <26d1f3d3-2894comp.sys.amiga@tronsbox.xei.com>
Organization: Defense Logistics Agency Systems Automation Center, Columbus
Lines: 19

In article <26d1f3d3-2894comp.sys.amiga@tronsbox.xei.com>, tron1@tronsbox.xei.com (HIM) writes:
> 
>  1) The LSE integrated editor environment now supports AREXX. 
> 
>  2) The LSE editor is now compatible with 8/16 color
>   workbenches.

These modifications sound great, but does anybody really use LSE? No smiley,
that was a serious question. How does it compare with other editors?

---Mike,



-- 
A man said to the Universe "Sir, I exist!" | Michael Figg  DSAC-FSD
"However," replied the Universe,           | DLA Systems Automation Center
"The fact has not created in me a          | Columbus, Ohio
sense of obligation."- Stephen Crane       | mfigg@dsac.dla.mil  CIS: 73777,360