Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!uoft02.utoledo.edu!desire!arc
From: arc@desire.wright.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: MED 2.10
Message-ID: <1092.26d49827@desire.wright.edu>
Date: 24 Aug 90 07:59:50 GMT
References: <11616@chaph.usc.edu>
Lines: 18

In article <11616@chaph.usc.edu>, wdao@alcor.usc.edu (Walter Dao) writes:
> I downloaded the MED archives twice and twice I got an error while trying to 
> load and run the prg. (error 121 or something).
> 
> Somebody stated that the program was 100% assembly language . well : WRONG !!!
> it is written in C (99% of the code), the source is in the archive.
> Which means that it is not as optimized and compact and fast as it could be.
> (dont give me the BS argument about ram expansion and accelerator boards , 
> they are NOT elegant solutions to a very simple problem.) 
> 
> so Instead of reposting the whole 500K of the archive, could somebody just 
> repost the MED program itself ?(just about <80k I think...) 
> 
> 			
> 					walt . 

   I'm the one who sent that 500K file up.  I will post the 66072 byte
executable.  It sure did look like it was ML.  Oh well, it still kicks butt.