Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!bacchus.pa.dec.com!granite.pa.dec.com!mwm From: mwm@raven.pa.dec.com (Mike (Real Amigas have keyboard garages) Meyer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Replace LSE with mg? (Re: LSE Gripes (was: does anybody use LSE?)) Message-ID: Date: 27 Aug 90 18:31:48 GMT References: <1990Aug27.092147.15405@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> Sender: news@wrl.dec.com (News) Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 18 In-Reply-To: xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG's message of 27 Aug 90 09:21:47 GMT In article <1990Aug27.092147.15405@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> xanthian@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG (Kent Paul Dolan) writes: The BENCHMARK Modula-2 compiler is integrated with a version of emacs (not as nice as mg, but OK), with compile, link, and test, and bounce to errors from the compiler to the editor, all hooked up to functions keys, and it makes for an excellent development environment. I think this demonstrates that your suggestion is quite feasible to implement. Um, if I've got things right (and I may not), that editor was based on an early version of mg. In other words, someone did exactly what Jordan suggested, only for Modula-2 instead of C.