Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!mcnc!ecsgate!ecsvax!paleo
From: paleo@uncecs.edu (Constantine A. LaPasha)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: SAS/C 5.10 question, and general stupid C question
Summary: seems to be other problems...
Keywords: STACK, WB, programming question
Message-ID: <1990Aug20.174640.13532@uncecs.edu>
Date: 20 Aug 90 17:46:40 GMT
References: <1990Aug20.131526.8180@uncecs.edu> <27937@nigel.ee.udel.edu>
Organization: UNC Educational Computing Service
Lines: 26

In article <27937@nigel.ee.udel.edu>, new@ee.udel.edu (Darren New) writes:
> The stack size in the CLI is set by the STACK command.
> The stack size from the WB is set in the icon (under 1.3).
> These are probably not the same in your case.
> 		   -- Darren
> 
> -- 
> --- Darren New --- Grad Student --- CIS --- Univ. of Delaware ---


yes, yes... but if I set the stack in the icon (for launch under WB)
the same, or bigger (say 4x or 8x the cli stack...) I get the
same results.  I don't think the stack as set in my cli or uin the
WB icon used to launch it is too small. (>10000)

It seems to be something in the program, or with the way it was 
compiled.

The other thing was more or less unrelated -- how do you get
the SAS/C 5.10 to have your application set its own stack size?
They infer that it can be done, but I haven't found it 
documented yet.
-- 
===============================================
Kostya LaPasha          paleo@ecsvax.uncecs.edu
==== ... virtually, we can do anything ... ====