Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!samsung!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekcrl!tekgvs!keithe
From: keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Subject: Re: 386 problems kinda resolved
Message-ID: <7987@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM>
Date: 20 Aug 90 22:15:52 GMT
References: <9008161712.AA10568@emunix.emich.edu>
Reply-To: keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson)
Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR.
Lines: 14

In article <9008161712.AA10568@emunix.emich.edu> stretch@EMUNIX.EMICH.EDU (Brian Stretch) writes:
>...My next machine will be non-Intel architecture, and I can
>gurantee that after I get my CompSci degree (currently an Honors student at
>Eastern Michigan), the company I work for, or the company I found, will
>never willfully use Intel machines. 

And once again the irrestible force meets the unmoveable object :-)

I guess we must simply have a _very_ good Intel sales rep: he
insured that all our pre-DX parts were replaced with workable IC's.
I even have one "spare" sitting here in the desk drawer in case he
missd one.  So not _all_ of Intel is screwed up!

kEITHe