Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!hplred!piety
From: piety@hplred.HP.COM (Bob Piety)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: 1024x768 monitors:  14" vs. 16+"
Message-ID: <100010001@hplred.HP.COM>
Date: 22 Aug 90 19:14:48 GMT
References: <19265@ttidca.TTI.COM>
Organization: Hewlett Packard Labs, Palo Alto CA
Lines: 10

I have a Seiko CM-1430, which only does *interlaced* 1024x768.  So, I
was ready to sell it and buy the Sony 1304 for non-interlaced hi-res.
But, when I went to look at one, I noticed that the VGA (640x480) mode
was no where near as crisp as I'm used to seeing on my Seiko.  So, I'm
still using the Seiko and foregoing 1024x768 non-interlaced.

But, if I had to have the hi-res, non-interlaced, I'd seriously look
into the NEC-4D or other monitor.  I did *not* like the Sony 1304.

Bob