Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!rice!uw-beaver!cornell!vax5!pv9y From: pv9y@vax5.cit.cornell.edu Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware Subject: Re: Deskwriter INK Message-ID: <5122.26d113ed@vax5.cit.cornell.edu> Date: 21 Aug 90 14:58:53 GMT References: <1990Aug17.165342.29750@granite.cr.bull.com> Distribution: na,comp Lines: 35 In article <1990Aug17.165342.29750@granite.cr.bull.com>, silverio@granite.cr.bull.com (Brian D. Silverio) writes: Some group at Macworld (can't find the blurb now) had a refill package (syringe and all) and claimed that when they released it in a few weeks they would have water-fast ink. Even if they don't get the water-fast ink done, the price on the refill was quite good- list price was $12.95 and they expected it to be discounted into the $9 range. It made refilling an option, whereas before it was the sort of thing you didn't necessarily want to mess with unless you knew what you were doing. Adam > At Macworld in Boston I went to the HP booth and asked about the > rumored water-fast ink. The response was that it would be released > in early 1991. Doing some quick math, I then asked if that meant it > was six months in the future. The marketing type thought for a moment > and then replied "Thats correct". I then pointed out that the ink has > been six months in the future since I bought my Deskwriter in August > 1989 and that I was tired of this run around. He then went into typical > marketing 101 what-to-say-when-you-dont-know-what-you-are-talking-about > drivel, so I left. > > The bottom line seems to be that HP does listen. However, instead of > reacting to customer requests they concoct lies to tell to keep the > noise level down. > > > --- > Neither my employer or I are authorized to speak for each other. -- Adam C. Engst pv9y@vax5.cit.cornell.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "I ain't worried and I ain't scurried and I'm having a good time" -Paul Simon