Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!umich!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!cert.sei.cmu.edu!krvw From: RADAI@HUJIVMS.BITNET (Y. Radai) Newsgroups: comp.virus Subject: Re: Disk Manager (PC) Message-ID: <0001.9008231338.AA20624@ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu> Date: 21 Aug 90 16:01:00 GMT Sender: Virus Discussion List Lines: 33 Approved: krvw@sei.cmu.edu Brian Aslakson writes: >I'd like to point out first that >even if you use READ-ONLY, it is designed for normal write operations, >and a virus which ignore this will probably get around this. (I'll >check if you ask me too). Second, if you use their software for a >purpose it was never intended for (I did ask already) and you get >surprised, don't even consider blaming anyone but yourself. Ontrack's >Disk Manager is not virus protection software! First of all, I'd like it to be clear that I was not recommending Disk Manager as an anti-viral product, but merely pointing out that Michael Greve's reference to DM as hard-disk protection was not as absurd as it apparently sounded to some readers (some of whom may have been unaware of the possibility of making a partition read-only when using DM). Secondly, the fact that DM was not designed for anti-viral purposes does not necessarily mean that the read-only option can't be useful in preventing infection by file viruses. Now if the protection were im- plemented by setting the read-only bit of each file in the protected partition, then you'd be right, for almost every virus clears this bit before trying to infect the file. But DM uses a device driver to con- trol all access to the logical drive, and that's a different story. True, it might still be possible to circumvent this protection, but I think it would be a lot harder. It should also be taken into account that very few virus writers would bother trying to write code to by- pass a particular anti-viral program unless that program were used on a very large percentage of computers. Y. Radai Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem, Israel RADAI@HUJIVMS.BITNET