Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!mit-eddie!thakur From: electro!alternat%watserv1.waterloo.edu@watcgl.waterloo.edu (Ann Hodgins) Newsgroups: rec.arts.cinema Subject: women's movies - definition Message-ID: <1990Aug20.155905.2725@eddie.mit.edu> Date: 20 Aug 90 15:59:05 GMT Sender: thakur@eddie.mit.edu (Manavendra K. Thakur) Reply-To: electro!alternat%watserv1.waterloo.edu@watcgl.waterloo.edu (Ann Hodgins) Followup-To: rec.arts.cinema Organization: University of Waterloo Lines: 78 Approved: thakur@zerkalo.harvard.edu Someone enquired to the net: what is a woman' s movie? I did not press F or r at the time because I expected that a flood of responses would make my own ideas redundant but now it seems that no one will respond, so I will. It seems to me that in the 50s and 60s (at least) the movie studios were totally controlled by male studio heads who hired men in all the key positions. Those men hired everyone else and chose the scripts and the directors. A man would chose the scripts, give authority to script changes and casting, consider the opinions of male intellectuals about 'classy' material, consider the opinions of male authorities about popular material, consider the input of male actors over female, respect male improvisations over female, etc., etc., etc., all down the line until the final product is evaluated by male critics. In the process a very considerable bias is built into the product. If media is a mirror to reality, then the result is a very distorting mirror. The result is media that deals with male concerns in a way that will tend to dismiss female concerns and will also tend to be overly flattering or reasurring to men. Male media tends to be a psychodrama for men rather than a fair picture of reality. By this I mean that a male drama would have as characters perhaps a man as he wants to be, a man that he dislikes, a man that he fears he might be, a woman that he wants, a woman he fears, a woman that he does not like, etc. As a result, male viewers see their reality and women see a warning about how they must behave to please. A woman's movie (by my definition) is the opposite of this. Ideally it would be women investors in a woman - owned production company, to female managed theatre, to female directors who chose camera angles to dwell on what *they* find interesting, to female casting directors, etc. Women critics would review it with the concerns of a feminine audience always in mind. Men would feel misrepresented and disturbed by the results but their opinions would be brushed aside. Obviously, a totally woman dominated media would be as bad as a male dominated one but in the meantime, women's movies are challenging without seriously threatening to distort male self-perception and sense of reality as much as a male dominated media has already shaped our minds. One distortion, for example, that really irrites me is the way that the camera seems to follow male characters as though women cease to exist when men walk out the door. Men do not know what goes on in their absence. This is a problem that men cannot overcome. They need women to fill in what women do alone, among themselves and what they privately think. A man, no matter how fair minded, cannot represent that reality for a woman. If the camera stays on the woman when the man walks away, I suspect a woman'\s influence on the movie. If women are integrated at every level of the movie making process we may well achieve a bia sex-bias-free media. That is my own personal utopian vision for the movie world. Things that do not impress me as good a or as 'women's movies' are movies that present women as dominant or aggressive since this is not a reflection of most women's true behaviour or fantasies. Dominant women are more likely to be male fantasy characters repressenting either what men want or what they fear. Culture should offer benefits to all its members equally. I have seen the process for black people from the time when their were no blacks except maids, to the time now when a black person can play villians, romantic leads and men on the street. There was a time in the middle when a black person could only play a very clean cut hero, such a Sidney Poitier. Women similarily went through a stage when women could only be fiesty and independent. I hope we are past that now and able to show the full range of real women's feelings and experience. Ann Hodgins