Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!cbnews!military
From: argosy!freeman@decwrl.dec.com (Jay R. Freeman)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: YF-23 Photographs just released.
Message-ID: <1990Aug14.033950.9340@cbnews.att.com>
Date: 14 Aug 90 03:39:50 GMT
References: <1990Jul25.004451.6348@cbnews.att.com> <1990Jul31.223453.6084@cbnews.att.com> <1990Aug7.041158.7805@cbnews.att.com> <1990Aug10.010647.29522@cbnews.att.com>
Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker)
Organization: MasPar Computer Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 16
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: argosy!freeman@decwrl.dec.com (Jay R. Freeman)

In article ... (Doug Mohney) writes:

>I have real doubts about the Navy version, given how well the Navy accepted
>the F-4 [...]

I think Doug has it backwards:  The F-4 was developed for the Navy, it was
the Air Force that had to accept a fighter originally developed for the
"other" service.

                                           -- Jay Freeman

	  <canonical disclaimer -- I speak only for myself>