Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!husc6!m2c!wpi!abaza@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
From: abaza@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Newsgroups: soc.religion.islam
Subject: Re: Muslim View on Middle East conflict
Message-ID: <14622@wpi.wpi.edu>
Date: 24 Aug 90 18:14:04 GMT
References: <1990Aug24.050736.14887@laguna.ccsf.caltech.edu>
Sender: shari@wpi.wpi.edu
Reply-To: abaza@csd4.csd.uwm.edu ()
Organization: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Lines: 24
Approved: shari@wpi.wpi.edu


In article <1990Aug24.050736.14887@laguna.ccsf.caltech.edu> zix@cs.nott.ac.uk (Zafer Iqbal) writes:
>According to Islam, what Sadam has done is correct. Borders between 2 Muslim
>countries should not exist!!! Islam requires unification of Muslim countries
>that the Uthmaniyah state was divided into so many smaller states that we know 
>today!
>
>Secondly it is haram to have to rely on kufr for the defence of Muslims!!!
>The Saudi puppet regime should have been overthrown long ago as should most of
>the existing puppet regimes (including Sadam!). 
>
>Zaf



I have no choice but to agree with you Zaf. This is what is Islam about.
No more than one ruler for muslims should be (A second khaliefah should
be killed.). I am amazed by comments from some people saying one muslim
country cannot envade another muslim country. Because it had to be only
one and not many countries.

IMPORTANT: Of course Saddam is not the proper ruler if there must be any.
           The effort must be made to remove Saddam but not to undo the
           unity between Kwuait and Iraq.