Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: alt.sources.d
Subject: Re: Archive-name
Message-ID: <GPH5TP8@ggpc2.ferranti.com>
Date: 27 Aug 90 13:07:25 GMT
References: <1990Aug13.162617.25478@cbnews.att.com> <9008211455.AA02499@talos.pm.com> <18508@rpp386.cactus.org> <9ZE5:-G@ggpc2.ferranti.com> <18512@rpp386.cactus.org>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 7

In article <18512@rpp386.cactus.org> jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II) writes:
> Perhaps people already are using the Archive-Name: header the way they
> are intended to be used.  Perhaps the postings with no Archive-Name: aren't
> intended to be archived,

I think it's clear, from messages of the form "I never heard of this Archive
Name header", that this isn't the case.
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
+1 713 274 5180.   'U`
peter@ferranti.com