Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!decwrl!apple!portal!analog2!calvin!craig
From: craig@calvin.UUCP (Craig S. Cochran)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: References to Information on "SLIP" Requested
Keywords: PPP SLIP
Message-ID: <504@calvin.UUCP>
Date: 28 Aug 90 17:56:29 GMT
References: <1990Aug24.010459.17379@cs.uoregon.edu> <BOB.90Aug24135634@volitans.MorningStar.Com>
Reply-To: sun!valid!ccochran (Craig S. Cochran)
Organization: Valid Logic Systems - San Jose, CA.
Lines: 13

In article <BOB.90Aug24135634@volitans.MorningStar.Com> bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) writes:
>
>But don't bother: SLIP has been obsoleted by PPP, the Point to Point
>Protocol, as defined in RFC1134 and refined in RFC1171 and RFC1172.

PPP?  I've bever heard of this.  Is this protocol more efficient than SLIP?
Is there a public domain implementation of PPP for Unix?  Will it support
PC-NFS?  Please enlighten me...

-- 
Craig S. Cochran                           Valid Logic Systems
Path:  {sun,decwrl}!valid!ccochran         2820 Orchard Parkway
Voice: 408/944-8037                        San Jose, CA  95134