Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!ns-mx!iowasp.physics.uiowa.edu!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!rutgers!ub!boulder!daemon From: imp@osa.com (Charles T. Lukaszewski) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: Re: Inaccurate interface statistics/Sniffer Message-ID: <25609@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Date: 4 Sep 90 10:13:13 GMT Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU Lines: 37 In our experience, the symptoms you describe may derive from one of both of a combination of two factors. There may be others. We have done extensive testing of every major protocol analyzer on the market and have found the Sniffer to be somewhat inaccurate, sometimes by substantial amounts, in its current form. In particular, when the results of a Sniffer analysis are compared to the interface statistics of certain computers (VAXes, DG Aviion & Sun tested to date), they do not match, often by an order of magnitude. This affects most protocol analyzers to one degree or another. We've found the Hewlett-Packard 4972 to be accurate almost 100% of the time, and is an excellent benchmark for the Sniffer, if you can get your hands on one. Network General itself uses the 4972 to test the Sniffer. If you have twisted-pair ethernet, this may be another source of discrepancy. There is a problem in many vendors (at least ODS & Synoptics - we're still checking Cabletron & David Systems) implementations of collision handling under 10BaseT. As there is no distinct collision detect line under 10BaseT as there is in an AUI cable (10BaseT has only Transmit & Receive lines), collisions must be communicated to individual stations through a transmission of a special preamble. Depending on your network design, that preamble can be transmitted to the rest of the network. We have documented this behavior at several client sites, and it seems to affect Cisco routers more than any other kind of network device. Specifically, while just about every other network device or node will ignore the preamble as network "junk", the cisco picks it up as a network error. The solution is to place a filtering bridge between the Cisco(s) and any twisted-pair equipment. Ciscos should *not* be directly connected to either ODS or Synoptics hubs if you wish to avoid this situation. _______________________________________________________________________________ Chuck Lukaszewski imp@osa.com 612 525-0000 Managing Partner & Chairman Open Systems Architects, Inc. "Who needs a disclaimer? I liked the opinions so much, I bought the company."