Xref: utzoo comp.emacs:9001 gnu.emacs:3750 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!uunet!mcsun!unido!tub!fauern!tumuc!lan!schoett From: schoett@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de (Oliver Schoett) Newsgroups: comp.emacs,gnu.emacs Subject: Re: (Summary) EMACS Security Hole. Message-ID: <4257@tuminfo1.lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de> Date: 3 Sep 90 12:15:19 GMT References: <1990Aug21.121958.22139@ncs.dnd.ca> Sender: news@lan.informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de Followup-To: comp.emacs Organization: Inst. fuer Informatik, Technische Univ. Muenchen, West Germany Lines: 17 In-reply-to: jstewart@ncs.dnd.ca's message of 21 Aug 90 12:19:58 GMT In article <1990Aug21.121958.22139@ncs.dnd.ca> jstewart@ncs.dnd.ca (John Stewart) writes: > The installation instructions also did not say to [install movemail > setuid root]. Well, how was it supposed to work under Berkely Unix then? I didn't see a way to use it without creating a security hole, and I replaced it by a (slow) shell script that used /usr/ucb/mail to fetch the messages. But I'm not sure whether /usr/ucb/mail does proper locking---it is not setuid. Oliver Schoett Institut f\"ur Informatik, Technische Univ. M\"unchen Postf. 202420, 8000 M\"unchen 2, Fed. Rep. of Germany schoett@informatik.tu-muenchen.dbp.de +49 89 2105 2390 schoett%informatik.....de@ {relay.cs.net, unido.uucp, dfngate.bitnet}