Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!crdgw1!underdog!volpe
From: volpe@underdog.crd.ge.com (Christopher R Volpe)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Nasty bug
Message-ID: <11482@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>
Date: 30 Aug 90 19:13:16 GMT
References: <2020@engage.enet.dec.com> <11477@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>
Sender: news@crdgw1.crd.ge.com
Reply-To: volpe@underdog.crd.ge.com (Christopher R Volpe)
Lines: 16

In article <11477@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>, volpe@underdog.crd.ge.com
(Christopher R Volpe) forgets to do his homework:

Bart Schaefer corrected me on this one. I retract my last post.

I read the line sec A7.3.2 where it said "The effect of the call is undefined
if the ... type of an argument after promotion disagrees with that
of the corresponding parameter." (in K&R II). But I didn't realize
that they meant *promoted* type of the formal parameter. I should
have read the rest of the paragraph.

                                               
==================
Chris Volpe
G.E. Corporate R&D
volpecr@crd.ge.com