Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!olivea!tymix!cirrusl!sungraph!dhesi
From: dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Internationalisation
Message-ID: <2349@cirrusl.UUCP>
Date: 1 Sep 90 08:12:06 GMT
References: <3603@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> <1911@islay.tcom.stc.co.uk> <1990Aug30.115608.3729@tsa.co.uk> <13716@smoke.BRL.MIL> <1302@mts.ucs.UAlberta.CA>
Sender: news@cirrusl.UUCP
Lines: 14

In <1302@mts.ucs.UAlberta.CA> userAKDU@mts.ucs.UAlberta.CA (Al Dunbar) writes:

     Regarding the arguments over whether or not "internationalization"
     is a valid word, I have concluded that there  are  two  points  of
     view,     which     could     generally     be    classified    as
     "internationalizationalism" and "anti-internationalizationalism".

Other            analogous            dichotomies
exist.       For      example,      there      is
"justification",      "right      justification",
and         "anti - right         justification".
--
Rahul Dhesi <dhesi%cirrusl@oliveb.ATC.olivetti.com>
UUCP:  oliveb!cirrusl!dhesi