Xref: utzoo comp.lang.postscript:5974 comp.sys.mac.system:1339
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cica!iuvax!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!pequod.cso.uiuc.edu!dorner
From: dorner@pequod.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Dorner)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript,comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: PostScript vs TrueType?
Message-ID: <1990Aug31.194241.27316@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 31 Aug 90 19:42:41 GMT
References: <9724@goofy.Apple.COM> <438@three.mv.com> <9931@goofy.Apple.COM> <5079@infmx.UUCP> <9995@goofy.Apple.COM>
Sender: usenet@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Reply-To: dorner@pequod.cso.uiuc.edu (Steve Dorner)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Lines: 17

In article <9995@goofy.Apple.COM> chewy@apple.com (Paul Snively) writes:
>I believe that; I was referring to the Macintosh drivers.  PostScript 
>definitely does its job of being independent well; it seems to be the 
>QuickDraw to PostScript conversion that can be problematic.

Yes, because Apple insists on putting hardware dependencies, including
68000 programs in hex, in its LaserPrep.  (Does anyone else feel a sense
of deja vu in this thread?)  To have such built into TrueType (if it is)
would pose a big problem for everyone with non-Apple printers.  Perhaps
that is exactly what Apple has in mind.

Like I said before, I'm ordering Adobe's Mac PostScript printer driver
as soon as they release it.  I suggest anyone with non-Apple printers
and Macintoshes do the same.
--
Steve Dorner, U of Illinois Computing Services Office
Internet: s-dorner@uiuc.edu  UUCP: uunet!uiucuxc!uiuc.edu!s-dorner