Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!samsung!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!newton.physics.purdue.edu!sawmill!mdbs!ed From: ed@mdbs.uucp (Ed Harfmann) Newsgroups: comp.lang.smalltalk Subject: Re: Wanted smalltalk jobs Message-ID: <1990Aug2.140637.17649@mdbs.uucp> Date: 2 Aug 90 14:06:37 GMT References: <11801@hydra.gatech.EDU> Reply-To: ed@mdbs.UUCP (Ed Harfmann) Distribution: usa Organization: mdbs, Inc. Lines: 22 In article <11801@hydra.gatech.EDU> ken@dali.gatech.edu (Ken Seefried iii) writes: >> >Dunno about right now, but since IBM endorsed Smalltalk/V >as part of SAA, I have seen the employment opportunities >widen considerably. Microsoft and IBM are apparently big >players right now, especially for OS/2-PM development. > >Course...that might just be rumours...;') ;') > The article that 'says' that IBM is endorsing "Smalltalk/V" as a standard development platform was retracted the following week because no one at IBM ever said that they were endorsing it. This does not mean that Object/Oriented development is not suggested for PM. It just means that Smalltalk/V has not been 'Blessed'. Other Object/Oriented development systems are available for OS/2 and PM development. My company produces one of these others. Ed Harfmann, Object/1 Project Manager. The views expressed are purely my own, and do not reflect those of mdbs. inc.