Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!usc!samsung!munnari.oz.au!mel.dit.csiro.au!smart From: smart@mel.dit.csiro.au (Robert Smart) Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc Subject: Re: What countries support MX records fully. Message-ID: <1990Aug30.014824.20322@mel.dit.csiro.au> Date: 30 Aug 90 01:48:24 GMT References: <1990Aug24.033234.19648@mel.dit.csiro.au> <25886@cs.yale.edu> Organization: CSIRO DIT (Melb.) Lines: 26 The consensus of opinion was that the top level domains known to the NIC should all support MXes. That isn't to say that the owner of that top level domain is responsible for everything that happens below, but that he should impress on the delegated subdomains the importance of setting up MX records for all reachable destinations (and not depend on pre-existing %-hack routes and such). That is certainly what happened in Australia. So I have changed to using a file generated from a whois command. Here is an extract from a makefile: whois %root-dom | awk '/\ / {print $$1}' >/usr/lib/mail/new-top test -s /usr/lib/mail/new-top mv /usr/lib/mail/new-top /usr/lib/mail/toplevel The character after the /\ in the whois line is a tab. This then defines a sendmail class using an F line. The $$ is to stop make interpreting the $1 (only use one $ in a shell script). The point of the exercise is that if new fake domains appear then I don't have to know about it. And in fact I am sure our major relay machine (munnari.oz.au) often knows how to get to get to domains that are on their way but haven't quite made it to the NIC. It also handles a lot of domains which only make sense in ACSnet. Bob Smart