Xref: utzoo comp.os.msdos.misc:194 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:1216
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!ucbvax!husc6!encore!pinocchio!schwalbe
From: schwalbe@pinocchio.Encore.COM (Jim Schwalbe)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: MS-DOS 4.01 vs. 3.3
Message-ID: <12604@encore.Encore.COM>
Date: 28 Aug 90 19:44:41 GMT
References: <38144@shemp.CS.UCLA.EDU> <q8R4N4w162w@micasa.UUCP>
Sender: news@Encore.COM
Reply-To: schwalbe@pinocchio.UUCP (Jim Schwalbe)
Followup-To: comp.os.msdos.misc
Distribution: na
Organization: Encore Computer Corp, Marlboro, MA
Lines: 13

I have seen an advertisement for DOS 3.31 which claims to break the 32
Megabyte restriction.  If this is true (can anyone verify this?) then
what's the difference between 3.31 and 4.01?  It seems strange to me that
they would make a major change like that and only bump the rev from 
3.30A to 3.31.

.---------------------------------------------------------------------------.
: Jim Schwalbe               .----------------. "Half of what I say is      : 
: Hardware Research Group .--+-------------.  |  meaningless; but I say it  :
: Encore Computer Corp.   |  | E N C O R E |  |  so that the other half may :
: Mail: {bu-cs,talcott}   |  `-------------+--'  reach you."                :
:      !encore!schwalbe   `----------------'             - Kahil Gibran     :
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------'