Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway From: STEF%NMA.COM@cunyvm.cuny.edu Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400 Subject: Re: Time zones again. Message-ID: <9009012056.aa24347@ICS.UCI.EDU> Date: 2 Sep 90 04:03:17 GMT Lines: 14 Approved: usenet@ICS.UCI.EDU Comments: +++ Changed X.430-Header: +++ x *** GATEWAY INFO: "ADMVM at DFNGATE" was the real originator of this note. TO: "Marvin Solomon" x CC: x CROSS REF: ;Your message of Fri ;9008311153.AA02971(a)gjetost.cs.wisc.edu AUTHORIZED: "Einar Stefferud" x MESSAGE ID: ;13781.652122926(a)nma.com x FROM: x SENSITIVITY: NORMAL x IMPORTANCE: NORMAL x REPLY TO: x BODY TYPE: IA5TEXT Hi Marvin -- NO -- I have been following from the beginning. Yes, I might have helped by including a smiley face, but I was seriously making some obsevations about the specific cases that Christain saiud he would handle in a very arbitrary way without looking at any other information, such as the .toplevel domain of the originator. It seems to me that in the cases where he wishes to be totally arbirtrary, that the information in the originators toplevel domain is relevant and close to conclusinve. That is all that I intended to convey. I do not suggest a general tie between any time zone and any toplevel name, for all time zones and all toplevel names. Cheers...\Stef;-)