Xref: utzoo alt.security:1463 alt.folklore.computers:4935 comp.society.futures:2082 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!wuarchive!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!mokry From: mokry@ctr.columbia.edu (Robert Mokry) Newsgroups: alt.security,alt.folklore.computers,comp.society.futures Subject: Re: Re: Feedback on Computer Crime - Apology Message-ID: <1990Aug28.182451.11662@ctr.columbia.edu> Date: 28 Aug 90 18:24:51 GMT References: <1990Aug27.194144.10910@cbnewsl.att.com> <1990Aug28.161459.11497@ctr.columbia.edu> <1990Aug28.174333.22132@athena.mit.edu> Organization: Columbia University Center for Telecommunications Research Lines: 31 In article <1990Aug28.174333.22132@athena.mit.edu> jik@athena.mit.edu (Jonathan I. Kamens) writes: >In article <1990Aug28.161459.11497@ctr.columbia.edu>, mokry@ctr.columbia.edu (Robert Mokry) writes: > Remember "innocent until proven guilty?" If the defense states that the >access to the machine was unintentional, and it is necessary for the access to >have been intentional in order for a crime to have been committed, then it is >up to the prosecution to prove that the access was intentional. Simple proof: The prosecutor points to the witness box where a nerdy boy is sitting and says, "This thing is a hacker, and he has a computer, and his computer dialed up another computer, and we all know computers don't make mistakes." The prosecutor doesn't need to make any strictly logical sense; he or she must just convince the judge or jury. >|> >3) Connecting to the wrong node was a genuine mistake, >|> > which you corrected by typing ^D. >|> >|> What sort of statement is ^D? Try explaining that to the judge. > > This is a red herring. If the judge is incapable of understanding the >relatively simple principles involved ("There is a standard character which is >used to signal to the other end of a remote connection that you wish to >disconnect from that connection. The defendant typed that character as soon >as he realized that he had connected to the wrong machine, and his connection >was ended.") Is it really a standard character? It may be standard in Unix, but what about other systems? Why not use ^C? What if a login program on a non-Unix computer gets confused and crashes when it gets ^D, letting the person on the system? And what if the person knows that this is the case?