Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ucsd!ucbvax!hplabs!nsc!pyramid!cbmvax!jesup From: jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware Subject: Re: Random-flakiness (was: Re: Random A500 reboots) Keywords: A500 reboot fix Message-ID: <14068@cbmvax.commodore.com> Date: 29 Aug 90 22:08:34 GMT References: <1990Aug14.192824.12994@athena.mit.edu> <7770@gollum.twg.com> Reply-To: jesup@cbmvax (Randell Jesup) Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA Lines: 30 In article <7770@gollum.twg.com> david@twg.com (David S. Herron) writes: >For part of his looking around he read comp.sys.amiga.all for >awhile. He got this impression that the Amiga's had a higher >amount of random-flakiness than the other computers. > >He wouldn't listen that he wasn't taking a statistically bad sample .. >And in any case, it might've been a good sample. Realize that people who don't have problems have no reason to post. Think of the fact that there are ~25-50,000 who read these groups (I haven't checked out news.lists recently). Also, all manufacturers have similar flakies over large populations. I remember reading an article in macuser or macworld listing the % of machines that had problems with specific parts in a mac (which being largely unrepairable, due to soldering, is less likely to have loose chip problems). Some of the numbers went as high as 15% or more (I think the highest was the analog video board), if I remember right. >This is one of those Customer Perceptions which should be erased >if it's to be taken as a Serious Machine. > >Maybe C= can increase/improve QA if it's necessary? We're certainly trying. Have you noticed the new FedEx repair policy? I certainly think that's a step in right direction. Disclaimer: I'm an software engineer, not a QA or marketing guy. -- Randell Jesup, Keeper of AmigaDos, Commodore Engineering. {uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!jesup, jesup@cbmvax.cbm.commodore.com BIX: rjesup Common phrase heard at Amiga Devcon '89: "It's in there!"