Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!unido!mpirbn!p554mve
From: p554mve@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: ColdReboot() - The Never Ending Story?
Message-ID: <1147@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>
Date: 28 Aug 90 18:27:19 GMT
References: <03021.AA03021@babylon.UUCP> <13839@cbmvax.commodore.com> <13847@cbmvax.commodore.com> <03065.AA03065@babylon.UUCP> <1191@tardis.Tymnet.COM> <03267.AA03267@babylon.UUCP>
Reply-To: p554mve@mpirbn.UUCP (Michael van Elst)
Organization: Max-Planck-Institut fuer Radioastronomie, Bonn
Lines: 17

In article <03267.AA03267@babylon.UUCP> rbabel@babylon.UUCP (Ralph Babel) writes:
>In article <1191@tardis.Tymnet.COM> jms@tardis.Tymnet.COM
>(Joe Smith) writes:
>> But interrupts can't come along after the CPU executes a
>> RESET instruction. The RESET instruction clears all the
>> interupt-enable bits.
>No, it's not!

Nevertheless, the current implementation of Supervisor() disables
interrupts.


-- 
Michael van Elst
UUCP:     universe!local-cluster!milky-way!sol!earth!uunet!unido!mpirbn!p554mve
Internet: p554mve@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."