Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!metro!grivel!gara!richard
From: richard@gara.une.oz.au (Richard Mackerras CCEN)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: tcsh ?? (was Re: C shell for msdos)
Summary: tcsh?
Keywords: csh shell
Message-ID: <3414@gara.une.oz.au>
Date: 29 Aug 90 11:42:01 GMT
References: <10217@hubcap.clemson.edu> <1990Aug27.071723.10409@agate.berkeley.edu> <1990Aug28.040348.12171@agate.berkeley.edu>
Organization: University of New England, Armidale, Australia
Lines: 12

In article <1990Aug28.040348.12171@agate.berkeley.edu>, ucbked@athena.berkeley.edu (Earl H. Kinmonth) writes:
> I canNOT see why anyone would want
> to go to csh as an alternative.

How about the tcsh. It's what I'm using under UNiX. It's really good
if you're a bit lazy at the keyboard or want to be able to recall and edit
history.

Nothing quite like it for pc??  (He asked against all hope)

	Richard Mackerras
	richard@gara.une.oz.au