Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!ogicse!zephyr.ens.tek.com!gvgpsa!gold!brandonl From: brandonl@gold.GVG.TEK.COM (Brandon Lovested) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Subject: Re: Low cost Mac's ? Message-ID: <1385@gold.GVG.TEK.COM> Date: 30 Aug 90 16:55:05 GMT References: <25541.26DA84DD@stjhmc.fidonet.org> Organization: Grass Valley Group, Grass Valley, CA Lines: 34 In article <25541.26DA84DD@stjhmc.fidonet.org> Chris.Gehlker@p12.f56.n114.z1.fidonet.org (Chris Gehlker) writes: >Kevin, I thought your post made some good points but I don't think that the >Mac is the right machine for members of the general public. The typical >person >who asks me about what kind of computer that they should buy will use the >thing >about two hours a week for light word processing and ballancing their >checkbook. As the so-and-so who started this surprisingly dynamic thread, I agree that in 1990, the average person does not "need" a computer. In 1910, the average person did not "need" a car, either. Our homes grow with our tools. However, the push is for intruction in general, and education specifically. Education is under-funded, and thus little money for computers. If there's little money in a market, there will be few of the best and brightest in it, relative to business applications, for example. > The primary advantage of the Mac, the consistent user interface across >applications, >will be totally lost on them because they will only get one or two >applications. > A good cross-application UI is great, but a good, single application UI is also. It wouldn't be a waste. ============================================================================== BRANDON G. LOVESTED ::::=:::==::===:==== FOR EVERY VISION, Software Design Engineer ::::=:::==::===:==== THERE IS AN Grass Valley Group ::::=:::==::===:==== EQUAL AND OPPOSITE brandonl@gold.gvg.tek.com ::::=:::==::===:==== REVISION. ==============================================================================