Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac.programmer:17246 comp.sys.mac.misc:2894 comp.sys.mac.system:1372
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!vms.macc.wisc.edu
From: yahnke@vms.macc.wisc.edu (Ross Yahnke, MACC)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer,comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.mac.system
Subject: Re: Virtual 2.0 and DiskExpress
Message-ID: <4316@dogie.macc.wisc.edu>
Date: 4 Sep 90 13:10:04 GMT
Sender: news@dogie.macc.wisc.edu
Followup-To: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Organization: University of Wisconsin Academic Computing Center
Lines: 15

In article <1990Aug31.223432.28381@cs.uoregon.edu>, mkelly@cs.uoregon.edu 
(Michael A. Kelly) writes...
-Now can virtual memory utilities such as these coexist with automatic disk
-optimizers such as DiskExpress II?  I understand that Virtual needs its disk

I think a way exists to "lock down" files so that DiskExpress won't
touch them while optimizing, this should probably occur for any
vm swapfile. 

Personally, I think DiskExpress is a well written & designed utility,
but I think it's a bit compulsive to have to have yur HD optimized
everyday. I find the constant disk access annoying, as it tries to
optimize while I'm using a word processor and trying to think...

>>> yahnke@macc.wisc.edu <<<