Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!mips!decwrl!csus.edu!ucdavis!uop!cheers!greg
From: greg@cheers.Bungi.COM (Greg Onufer)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Subject: Re: DUARTS etc
Message-ID: <GM{%B~$.5601@cheers.Bungi.COM>
Date: 3 Sep 90 10:36:27 GMT
References: <m0i8bAS-0000F9C@daver.bungi.com>
Organization: Cheers Bar & Grill
Lines: 11

>> Looks like a pretty good scheme; but what's magic about 70 * 7 ( = 490 )
>> bytes for the buffer size?
>That's uucp g protocol, with a window of 7... Can you tell I have a
>fixation on uucp? :-)

For the worst-case scenario, might as well make that 72*7 since the
4.3BSD UUCP has a feature/bug of sending two nulls after every packet.

What if you're talking g-protocol with a 4k packet size? :-)

Cheers!greg