Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!sun!amdcad!ashirvad!indra
From: indra@ashirvad.amd.com (Indra Singhal)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: QUERY: Reviews of telecommunication packages for Win3.0
Keywords: QUERY TELECOMMUNICATIONS 3.0 MODEM SPAM SPAM SPAMMITY-SPAM
Message-ID: <1990Aug28.191052.19058@amd.com>
Date: 28 Aug 90 19:10:52 GMT
References: <366@casemo.UUCP> <26CC8B8F.1885@deimos.cis.ksu.edu>
Sender: usenet@amd.com (NNTP Posting)
Organization: Advanced Micro Devices; Sunnyvale, CA
Lines: 22

In article <26CC8B8F.1885@deimos.cis.ksu.edu> popeye@doc.ksu.ksu.edu (Karl Richard Buck) writes:
>
>The short of it is I looked at the latest version of Unicom and becoming really
>pissed at the nag messages and the crippled version I took the risk and 
>registered.... and I really like it. 
>
I got pi**'d too and sent mail to the author. He replied promptly
saying that he had placed a UNICOM 2.0c on compuserve that is
functionally operational but continues to have the nagmessages. (I can
live with that.) From 1st looks, I liked what I saw (except I could not
use 19.2, and some other features...). The author also indicated that
vt100 would be supported in a future release.

Would someone let me know when this version is available for anonymous
ftp? I do not subscribe to CS. 

Thanks.

--
iNDRA | indra@amd.com (Indra Singhal) (408) 749-5445
      | {ames decwrl apple pyramid sun uunet}!amdcad!indra
      | MS 167; Box 3453; 901, Thompson Pl., Sunnyvale, CA 94088