Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!snorkelwacker!paperboy!osf.org!daniel
From: daniel@osf.org (Daniel Dardailler)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.motif
Subject: Re: Motif 1.0 and X11-R4
Message-ID: <12625@paperboy.OSF.ORG>
Date: 29 Aug 90 13:55:02 GMT
References: <589@bohra.cpg.oz> <6785@milton.u.washington.edu> <12601@paperboy.OSF.ORG>
Sender: news@OSF.ORG
Reply-To: daniel@osf.org (Daniel Dardailler)
Organization: Open Software Foundation
Lines: 22

Esmond Pitt writes:
> We have been running Motif 1.0* with its own R3 Xt, on top of the X11R4
> Xlib, talking to R3 servers. 

Maybe I should have only mention R3 Xt Intrinsics vs R4 Xt (Motif 1.0
*requires* its own Xt), although I don't think it's really safe to use 
Xlib R4 as well.

> I believe R4 servers would work as well.
The server side is not significant here.

> I am frankly surprised and disappointed to see this
> mis-statement re-emerge from OSF.
Ok, the next time I'll push the delete button instead of trying to help
this public domain list.
BTW, I've add a real disclaimer :-)

        Daniel Dardailler          |          OSF/Motif Team  
     Open Software Foundation      |      Email : daniel@osf.org           
       11 Cambridge Center         |      Phone : (617) 621 8840    
       CAMBRIDGE, MA 02142         |      Fax   : (617) 621 0584
       Disclaimer : This is just my opinion, not my employer's