Path: utzoo!utstat!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!uhnix1!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: news.software.b
Subject: Re: Installation woes (Re: Passing on unwanted groups)
Message-ID: <4PH5NI8@ggpc2.ferranti.com>
Date: 27 Aug 90 12:55:18 GMT
References: <1990Aug15.164651.26664@zoo.toronto.edu> <1990Aug21.161506.21784@zoo.toronto.edu> <3ND5KOC@xds13.ferranti.com> <5fq0f2.zm6@smurf.sub.org> <1990Aug26.195308.11696@maytag.waterloo.edu>
Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 9

In article <1990Aug26.195308.11696@maytag.waterloo.edu> gamiddle@maytag.waterloo.edu (Guy Middleton) writes:
> This is exactly why I don't like Configure.  I have ten different architecture
> here, and a canned set of Build-answers for each one.  I can maintain
> everything from a single machine, instead of running Configure ten times every
> time I need to recompile.

But you can save your Configure answers, too! Better than Build, even, since
you have to run Build to rebuild those doit files... I tried making a non-
interactive version of build, but it's got too much non-saved state.
-- 
Peter da Silva.   `-_-'
+1 713 274 5180.   'U`
peter@ferranti.com