Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!dali.cs.montana.edu!milton!forbis
From: forbis@milton.u.washington.edu (Gary Forbis)
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: Chalmers on Searle
Keywords: Other minds
Message-ID: <7079@milton.u.washington.edu>
Date: 5 Sep 90 05:22:53 GMT
References: <25761@cs.yale.edu> <6022@milton.u.washington.edu> <25770@cs.yale.edu>
Organization: University of Washington, Seattle
Lines: 17

You know, I've seen this line several times before.  After some personal
mail I think I understand what is being said but then the next time I see
it I find once again I cannot make heads or tails of it.  I would like to
see what the consensus oppinion is.  Would those who feel so inclined send
me a brief interpretation of the following quoted text, giving particular
emphasis as how it relates to the other mind problem.

In article <25770@cs.yale.edu> blenko-tom@cs.yale.edu (Tom Blenko) writes:
>How does one determine whether a city has civic pride (or to what
>degree it might be said to have civic pride)?  Yet one can rank-order
>the cities one has lived in according to the civic pride one feels they
>possess.  And one can arrive at such judgements without participating
>in the life of the city.

Thanks,

gary forbis@milton.u.washington.edu