Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!munnari.oz.au!metro!grivel!gara!pnettlet From: pnettlet@gara.une.oz.au (Philip Nettleton) Newsgroups: comp.ai Subject: Re: What AI is exactly. Summary: Flame again? Message-ID: <3568@gara.une.oz.au> Date: 7 Sep 90 03:46:32 GMT References: <34175@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> <25392@boulder.Colorado.EDU> <38801@siemens.siemens.com> Organization: University of New England, Armidale, Australia Lines: 85 In article <38801@siemens.siemens.com>, wood@jfred.siemens.edu (Jim Wood) writes: > I originally wrote: > > >> Artificial Intelligence is a computer science and engineering > >> discipline which attempts to model human reasoning methods > >> computationally. > > and pnettlet@gara.une.oz.au (Philip Nettleton) writes [and I edit]: > > >I think it is a terribly poor definition, actually, for the following > >reasons: > > >a) Human intelligence is NOT the only form of intelligence. This is an > > extremely one-eyed viewpoint. Dolphins are extremely intelligent, and > > the only reason we cannot communicate with them to date is because of > > the extreme differences in our vocal ranges and auditory senses. > > There is also a huge cultural gap. What concerns do dolphins have? > > What form does their communication take? We need to know these > > BEFORE we can even look at syntax and semantics. Hence their > > intelligence is very alien to ours. > > Agreed with (a), but I do not recall having implied human intelligence is > the only form of intelligence. However, it is certainly the most > interesting to artificial intelligence scientists and engineers. From the > practical perspective, it is the only type of intelligence which interests > industry, from which the purse flows. Who said what? -> ignored as unconstructive. As for there being more money in Human Intelligence "simulators", I don't think DARP (Defence Advanced Research Project) would agree. Their director some years ago stated (something similar to): I would be glad to have a tank which could hunt down and kill other tanks as well as my cats hunt down birds. Not that I agree even in part with Autonomus Weapons Systems, but the point is clear. Defence spending is HUGE. Producing a tank based on Human Intelligence is counter productive. Humans tend to moralise, desert or defect. A certain amount of controlled animal wildness is critical in military operations. > Your reference to machine intelligence is a good one, but it is a mistake > to overshadow human intelligence with it in defining artificial intelligence. Human divinity? -> ignored as unconstructive. > I did not say AI models human intelligence. I was very specific to say that > it models human reasoning methods. I also believe our knowledge of human > reasoning is limited, but that does not stop AI scientists and engineers > from developing theories and applications. Who said what? -> ignored as unconstructive. No it does not, but it may put the blinkers on their thinking about other possibilities, which is what this is really all about. > >Artificial Intelligence means: > > An intelligent system designed by mankind to run on a man-made > > artifact, for example, a computer. The term Machine Intelligence > > is more succinct because it identifies the type of intelligence > > created. > > Artificial intelligence is not a system, any more than computer science is > a system. Intelligent systems are the product of artificial intelligence > METHODOLOGIES. For example, an expert system is not "artificial > intelligence", rather it is the result of applying artificial intelligence > methodologies. Granted. I should have said an "Artificial Intelligence System means:". Sorry, but one can only edit one's own work so far. Artificial Intelligence is the artibute that such a system would exibit. Artificial Intelligence is also a field of research aimed at bringing this about. Regards, Philip Nettleton, Department of Maths, Stats and Computing, The University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, 2351, AUSTRALIA.