Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!xhg0998
From: xhg0998@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
Newsgroups: comp.ai
Subject: Re: Comments on "The Emperor's New Mind
Message-ID: <47000004@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 13 Sep 90 02:44:00 GMT
References: <47000003@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu>
Lines: 11
Nf-ID: #R:uxa.cso.uiuc.edu:47000003:uxa.cso.uiuc.edu:47000004:000:479
Nf-From: uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!xhg0998    Sep 12 21:44:00 1990


What is G in Goedel's theorem's case? The very definition of G involves
recursing reference to itself and is therefore not defined. If you plug
anything specific into G, then the definition of G does not hold any more.
This is similar to S in the S statement. 
For now, like many other determinists, half-doubt and half believe 
quantum mechanics. But I don't feel like to talk more on it since I just
begin to read quantum mechanics.
Thank you for your comments.
Xiaoping
:wq