Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!snorkelwacker!usc!samsung!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekcrl!tekgvs!keithe From: keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: Replys by email (Was Re: VI Editor Wanted For My PC) Message-ID: <8080@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM> Date: 10 Sep 90 18:20:52 GMT References: <8560@ccncsu.ColoState.EDU> <1073@applix.com> <1843@cs.rit.edu> <19892@crg5.UUCP> <925@sagpd1.UUCP> <1990Sep7.174431.20278@uwasa.fi> Reply-To: keithe@tekgvs.LABS.TEK.COM (Keith Ericson) Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton, OR. Lines: 22 In article <1990Sep7.174431.20278@uwasa.fi> ts@uwasa.fi (Timo Salmi LASK) writes: }In article <925@sagpd1.UUCP> monty@sagpd1.UUCP (Monty Saine) writes: }: }> be appreciated. As I said please e-mail response as I rarely read }> this group (today was an exception). } }This always gets me on my high horse. In my opinion there are }several good and valid reasons for asking emailed replys, but not }being a regural reader is definitely not among them. I've always }felt that if one is interested enough to pose a question to a group, }and expect answers, one should also have the courtesy to be prepared }to follow up the group. } I concur 100%. If you ask a question, at least have the decency to wait around for the answer! Keith (on my high horse, too!) Ericson, aka kEITHe PS - the Elvis vi-clone editor seems to compile up and work reasonably well. I mean, if _I_ can get something to compile and run it _must_ have been put together pretty well!