Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!pacbell!pacbell.com!decwrl!wuarchive!udel!princeton!njin!spcvxa.spc.edu!terry From: terry@spcvxa.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Telebit T2500 problem with internal 2400 modem Message-ID: <1990Sep7.232331.511@spcvxa.spc.edu> Date: 7 Sep 90 23:23:31 GMT References: <9197@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu> <9209@uhccux.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu> <1990Sep7.152529.18088@ultra.com> Distribution: na Organization: St. Peter's College, US Lines: 29 In article <1990Sep7.152529.18088@ultra.com>, rmg@ultra.com (Rich Geiger) writes: > A user at our site also had similar problems coming into our T2500 > with an externel Everex Evercom 24+. He contacted Everex, who sent > them an updated PROM which fixed the problem. I don't know whether > this can be taken as evidence that it is Everex (rather than Telebit) > who was out of spec with regard to the CCIT standard dictating how > connect speed negotiaion is supposed to be done. Yup, the Evercom 24+ modems (both internal and external) used to have a problem where `unusual' answer tones would confuse them. The 4 pips in the V.32 answer sequence would do it, and I suppose PEP would as well. The symptom is that when calling such a modem from an Evercom 24+, you'd hear the ring, hear the far-end modem pick up, and right after the first V.32 pip you'd get a NO CARRIER on the Evercom 24+. This was fixed quite some time ago by a PROM upgrade (27128, I believe). The FAX card also had the same problem, I don't know if the upgrade for that one ever made it out (I assume it did, and was just delayed). This should be a free upgrade from Everex for small numbers of modems. If you have more than a few (2-3), they may either ask for the old chips back, or suggest you copy them locally if you have the facility to do so. Terry Kennedy Operations Manager, Academic Computing terry@spcvxa.bitnet St. Peter's College, US terry@spcvxa.spc.edu (201) 915-9381 Disclaimer: We're an Everex distributor, but only for internal use. The policies I stated above were Everex's policies at the time I found the problem; contact Everex technical support for the latest information.