Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!boulder!daemon
From: satz@cisco.com (Greg Satz)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: LAT-Telnet Translation over Ethernet Media
Message-ID: <25821@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Date: 7 Sep 90 09:33:30 GMT
Sender: news@boulder.Colorado.EDU
Lines: 11

The primary reason for getting a CSC/3 processor is for the larger memory.
A CSC/2 processor will work just fine in the MGS and CGS boxes provided the
routing tables don't grow too large. If you are passing around the entire
catenet and you are running lots of different protocols, you may experience
some memory congestion when the software is running out of RAM. This is
more a function of the environment outside of the chassis then the actual
chassis itself. We also have software that will run from ROM leaving all of
RAM available for routing tables, etc. This will allow the CSC/2 processor
to function for some time to come.

Greg