Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!dimacs.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!athos.rutgers.edu!hedrick
From: hedrick@athos.rutgers.edu (Charles Hedrick)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco
Subject: Re: CSC/3 vs. CSC/2 processor
Message-ID: <Sep.8.22.42.05.1990.7395@athos.rutgers.edu>
Date: 9 Sep 90 02:42:07 GMT
References: <25834@boulder.Colorado.EDU>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 6

I've already commented on this before to people within cisco, but it's
probably worth adding my voice to the public comments.  A number of
our departments recently finished upgrading from CSC1's to CSC2's.  It
is too soon to be forcing them into another upgrade, particularly to a
system that is not expandable.  I would strongly suggest the use of
SIMM's or something similar.