Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!usc!snorkelwacker!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!news.funet.fi!tut!jh From: jh@tut.fi (Juha Heinanen) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: LAT-Telnet / Telnet-LAT in a router Message-ID: Date: 8 Sep 90 08:22:49 GMT References: <25806@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Sender: news@funet.fi (#News ) Organization: Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland. Lines: 15 In-Reply-To: BILLW@mathom.cisco.com's message of 7 Sep 90 02:45:29 GMT In article <25806@boulder.Colorado.EDU> BILLW@mathom.cisco.com (WilliamChops Westfield) writes: It isn't designed to have LAT and TCP on separate ethernets - do you think that would be a useful addition? It doesn't seem like a common configuration for people to have their LAT network completely distinct from their IP network. What we would need is a TELNET/LAT translator integrated in a router so that one could run LAT over any part of the Internet, ie. LAT-TELNET in the source router and TELNET-LAT at the destination. This would solve the problem of running LAT over long distance when bridging is for some reason or other out of question. -- -- Juha Heinanen, Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland jh@tut.fi (Internet), tut!jh (UUCP), jh@tut (Bitnet)