Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!clyde.concordia.ca!uunet!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!hayes.fai.alaska.edu!accuvax.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: jwb@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Jim Breen) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Best and Worst (was: Labor Day, 1990) Message-ID: <11941@accuvax.nwu.edu> Date: 10 Sep 90 01:52:00 GMT Sender: news@accuvax.nwu.edu Organization: Monash_University Lines: 53 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 633, Message 10 of 12 In article <11895@accuvax.nwu.edu>, john@bovine.ati.com (John Higdon) writes: > Jim Breen writes: > > In the best/worst voting, my opinions (based on experience) are: > > BEST: Japan > > WORST: India > Bzzzzt! Wrong -- but thanks for playing anyway. Without getting into > the "US is best" fray, I can categorically state that Japan does NOT > have the worlds best telephone service, unless there are criteria that > I am missing. > * No itemized billing (not even for "Dial-Q", Japan's 900 equivalent) True, but then I was used to this. > * About one out of ten calls bomb (don't go through). Not on my observation. > * Long distance within Japan "sounds" like long distance. In my experience much less so than in the US. > * Digital services are just being introduced. Whereas the US is *completely* digital? > * Outside plant is pathetic and inadequate. Not in my experience. > * Even though the system is "privatized", it is run like a government > bureaucracy. Whereas AT&T was a paragon of lean and mean private enterprise. Anyway, an irrelevant point. > * You get to hear the "meter pulses" on many calls. I haven't noticed. > Sources: close associates who live and work in Japan. So have I. Jim Breen ($B%8%`(J) (jwb@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au) Dept of Robotics & Digital Technology. Monash University PO Box 197 Caulfield East VIC 3145 Australia (ph) +61 3 573 2552 (fax) +61 3 573 2745