Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!pilchuck!dataio!bright
From: bright@Data-IO.COM (Walter Bright)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Zortech bug #24 - member access in static member function
Message-ID: <2703@dataio.Data-IO.COM>
Date: 11 Sep 90 01:23:03 GMT
References: <17.26EA603B@ananke.stgt.sub.org> <1430@proto.COM> <6744@darkstar.ucsc.edu>
Organization: Data I/O Corporation; Redmond, WA
Lines: 20

In article <6744@darkstar.ucsc.edu> daniel@cis.ucsc.edu (Daniel Edelson) writes:
<In article <1430@proto.COM> joe@proto.COM (Joe Huffman) writes:
<<In article <17.26EA603B@ananke.stgt.sub.org>, kaiser@ananke.stgt.sub.org 
<<[...Bug report for Zortech C++ compiler...]
<<You may mail your bug reports to...
<<....                       Posting them on the net is probably 
<<inappropriate most of the time.
<I disagree. We in the community benefit from this information,
<until of course it becomes tedious or redundant.

Actually, the trouble is that we (Zortech) don't always get the bug
reports if they are posted to various networks. For instance, we don't
know about the other 23. I know Andreas posted some of them to Fido,
but my Fido connection is flaky and I didn't get even a quarter of them.
People should at least
email a copy of it directly to us, so we can be sure and get
the problems resolved.

There is a mailing list for Zortech bug reports, and people interested
in them can subscribe, rather than boring everyone on the net about it.