Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!pt.cs.cmu.edu!dsl.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: What's WRONG with Forth?
Message-ID: <1693.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 9 Sep 90 04:47:31 GMT
Organization: String, Scotch tape, and Paperclips.  (in Pgh, PA)
Lines: 14


 Date: 09-05-90 (10:38)              Number: 3721 (Echo)
   To: GARY SMITH                    Refer#: 3716
 From: STEVE PALINCSAR                 Read: NO
 Subj: WHY NOT FORTH                 Status: PUBLIC MESSAGE

 You're right, Gary.  That diatribe seems to be based on about a 5 minute
 exposure.  "Can't write a recursive forth routine"???  No faith that an 
 argument he put on the stack will be there later?  And "not fast"?

 Humbug.
-----
This message came from GEnie via willett through a semi-automated process.
Report problems to: uunet!willett!dwp or dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us